<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rights.com &#187; First Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rights.com/category/first-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rights.com</link>
	<description>Individual rights and today's issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:40:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Shows with gays could lose Florida tax credit</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/03/09/shows-with-gays-could-lose-florida-tax-credit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/03/09/shows-with-gays-could-lose-florida-tax-credit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing the Right Thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A proposal that would increase current tax credits from two to five percent of productions costs for shows considered &#8220;family friendly.&#8221;  This would not include shows that featured &#8220;gay characters.&#8221;
Florida, how about being &#8220;family friendly&#8221; by lowering taxes for everyone?  Come on, this is as stupid as judging someone by the color of their skin [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5ipQeKy9QQu5ZT0VVcG_uJ5-kp-eg" target="_blank">A proposal</a> that would increase current tax credits from two to five percent of productions costs for shows considered &#8220;family friendly.&#8221;  This would not include shows that featured &#8220;gay characters.&#8221;</p>
<p>Florida, how about being &#8220;family friendly&#8221; by lowering taxes for everyone?  Come on, this is as stupid as judging someone by the color of their skin or the color of their eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/03/09/shows-with-gays-could-lose-florida-tax-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the parasites can vote themselves a bigger bite from the host&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/03/09/when-the-parasites-can-vote-themselves-a-bigger-bite-from-the-host/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/03/09/when-the-parasites-can-vote-themselves-a-bigger-bite-from-the-host/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama-Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
President Obama has proposed a 1.4 % pay increase for active duty military in 2011. This is the LOWEST since 1973. Nice to know that during a time of rampant inflation, while a war is fought in 2 theatres, our men and women in uniform get a LOWER PAY INCREASE THAN WELFARE RECIPIENTS.     [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<h3><span style="font-weight: normal;">President Obama has proposed a 1.4 % pay increase for active duty military in 2011. This is the LOWEST since 1973. Nice to know that during a time of rampant inflation, while a war is fought in 2 theatres, our men and women in uniform get a LOWER PAY INCREASE THAN WELFARE RECIPIENTS.      &#8211; from K.P.L.</span></h3>
</blockquote>
<p>When the parasites can vote themselves a bigger bite from the host, they will do so.  The law is supposed to protect you and your life from being voted into subservience, but when the law is used instead to steal from a disarmed population, the law has been perverted.  Today many people believe the concept of personal responsibility means expecting someone else to pay for you and what you believe you &#8220;need.&#8221;</p>
<p>Today, the parasites are in control and the parasites have realized they can vote themselves a bigger bite from the host.  And the chief parasites in Washington want to maintain control by directing where the rest of the parasites can take their bite based on how you are favored &#8211; from the filet portion or  the keister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/03/09/when-the-parasites-can-vote-themselves-a-bigger-bite-from-the-host/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama ends &#8220;leave internet alone&#8221; policy</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/02/28/obama-ends-leave-internet-alone-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/02/28/obama-ends-leave-internet-alone-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doing the Right Thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama-Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The US government’s policy of leaving the Internet alone is over, according to Obama’s top official at the Department of Commerce.&#8221; Assistant Secretary Larry Strickling, The Register and see the NTIA presentation.
The internet is too powerful for governments that want to control the thoughts of their population to leave alone.  Along with the extension of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;The US government’s policy of leaving the Internet alone is over, according to Obama’s top official at the Department of Commerce.&#8221; Assistant Secretary Larry Strickling, <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/27/internet_3_dot_0_policy/" target="_blank">The Register</a> and see the <a href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/presentations/2010/MediaInstitute_02242010.html" target="_blank">NTIA presentation</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>The internet is too powerful for governments that want to control the thoughts of their population to leave alone.  Along with the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/27/AR2010022702870.html">extension of the Patriot Act</a> (WashingtonPost.com), the Obama Administration arguing in Federal Court that there is <a href="http://www.rights.com/2010/02/11/obama-admin-pushes-for-tracking-all-cell-phones/">no &#8220;reasonable expectation of privacy&#8221; on cell phones</a> &#8211; funny, we missed the ACLU, EFF, and the press having conniptions about the Democrat controlled Congress and Democrat President signing the extension &#8211; Washington has a nice tight grip on the communications of the country.</p>
<p>But, it is nice to have &#8220;government oversight&#8221; over everything &#8211; you wouldn&#8217;t want to do something without permission would you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/02/28/obama-ends-leave-internet-alone-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Admin pushes for tracking all cell phones</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/02/11/obama-admin-pushes-for-tracking-all-cell-phones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/02/11/obama-admin-pushes-for-tracking-all-cell-phones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[T]he Obama administration has argued that warrantless tracking is permitted because Americans enjoy no &#8220;reasonable expectation of privacy&#8221; in their&#8211;or at least their cell phones&#8217;.
CNET has the rest of the story at http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10451518-38.html
The question is not only whether the Fourth Amendment prohibits it, the question is where in the Constitution the Federal Government is given [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>[T]he Obama administration has argued that warrantless tracking is permitted because Americans enjoy no &#8220;reasonable expectation of privacy&#8221; in their&#8211;or at least their cell phones&#8217;.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10451518-38.html">CNET has the rest of the story at http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10451518-38.html</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The question is not only whether the Fourth Amendment prohibits it, the question is where in the Constitution the Federal Government is given the power to do so and the answer is nowhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/02/11/obama-admin-pushes-for-tracking-all-cell-phones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corp man is &#8220;Corpse man&#8221; according the President Obama and the Press &#8220;Corpse&#8221; ignores it.</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/02/08/corps-man-according-the-president-obama-and-the-press-corpse-ignores-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/02/08/corps-man-according-the-president-obama-and-the-press-corpse-ignores-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If President Bush had said &#8220;corpse man&#8221; instead of &#8220;corps man&#8221; the press would have been all over it.  Instead the stenographers in Washington ignore it.  I should say, the &#8220;Press Corpse&#8221; in Washington ignores it.
How appropriate that the President would refer to them as the &#8220;Press Corpse&#8221; &#8211; they are dead to their jobs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If President Bush had said &#8220;corpse man&#8221; instead of &#8220;corps man&#8221; the press would have been all over it.  Instead the stenographers in Washington ignore it.  I should say, the &#8220;Press Corpse&#8221; in Washington ignores it.</p>
<p>How appropriate that the President would refer to them as the &#8220;Press Corpse&#8221; &#8211; they are dead to their jobs and let personal biases guide their reporting.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZlKIfzoC8D0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZlKIfzoC8D0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/02/08/corps-man-according-the-president-obama-and-the-press-corpse-ignores-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax dollars &#8220;should be used for weapons to fight terrorists, not lawyers to represent terrorists.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/01/19/tax-dollars-should-be-used-for-weapons-to-fight-terrorists-not-lawyers-to-represent-terrorists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/01/19/tax-dollars-should-be-used-for-weapons-to-fight-terrorists-not-lawyers-to-represent-terrorists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing the Right Thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tax dollars &#8220;should be used for weapons to fight terrorists, not lawyers to represent terrorists.&#8221; Scott Brown, January 19, 2010
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tax dollars &#8220;should be used for weapons to fight terrorists, not lawyers to represent terrorists.&#8221; Scott Brown, January 19, 2010</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/01/19/tax-dollars-should-be-used-for-weapons-to-fight-terrorists-not-lawyers-to-represent-terrorists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Town Meeting/Town Hall Slogans</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/08/16/town-meeting-slogans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2009/08/16/town-meeting-slogans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doing the Right Thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in April we had Tea Party Slogans, now here are some town meeting slogans:
Obama Lies, Grandma Dies!
Your health plans make me sick!
If socialized medicine is best&#8230;why didn&#8217;t Ted Kennedy go to Canada?
If Congress likes Obamacare so much, why don&#8217;t they test drive it first?
[] Universal Healthcare [] Freedom.  You can only pick one!
Stop!  You&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in April we had <a href="http://www.rights.com/2009/04/15/tea-party-slogans/">Tea Party Slogans</a>, now here are some town meeting slogans:</p>
<p>Obama Lies, Grandma Dies!</p>
<p>Your health plans make me sick!</p>
<p>If socialized medicine is best&#8230;why didn&#8217;t Ted Kennedy go to Canada?</p>
<p>If Congress likes Obamacare so much, why don&#8217;t they test drive it first?</p>
<p>[] Universal Healthcare [] Freedom.  You can only pick one!</p>
<p>Stop!  You&#8217;re starting to scare George Orwell!</p>
<p>I am sick and tired of people who call you unpatriotic if you debate this administration&#8217;s policies.  We should stand up and say, we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration! &#8211; Hillary Clinon</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t fix stupid, but you can vote it out!</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter what the sign says, they&#8217;ll say its racist anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2009/08/16/town-meeting-slogans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anderson&#8217;s &#8216;Buy Black&#8217; becomes a national racist movement!</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/05/12/andersons-buy-black-becomes-a-national-racist-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2009/05/12/andersons-buy-black-becomes-a-national-racist-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doing the Right Thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maggie and John Anderson of Chicago vowed four months ago that for one year, they would try to patronize only black-owned businesses. The &#8220;Empowerment Experiment&#8221; is the reason John had to suffer for hours with a stomach ache and Maggie no longer gets that brand-name lather when she washes her hair. &#8230; Now, the Andersons [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Maggie and John Anderson of Chicago vowed four months ago that for one year, they would try to patronize only black-owned businesses. The &#8220;Empowerment Experiment&#8221; is the reason John had to suffer for hours with a stomach ache and Maggie no longer gets that brand-name lather when she washes her hair. &#8230; Now, the Andersons are following up with 4,000 people who signed up for the experiment on their Web site to gauge their commitment and set up online accounts to track their spending. <a href=" http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D984SLN80&amp;show_article=1" target="_blank"> http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D984SLN80&amp;show_article=1</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Can you imagine the outrage if anyone started a &#8220;Buy White&#8221; movement?  Instead, let&#8217;s try a &#8220;buy human&#8221; experiment?  Only buy from human owned businesses.  <strong>Every other distinction is racist.<span id="more-318"></span><br />
</strong></p>
<p>To sum up the rampant racism that still exists in the United States, Dallas Smith, who owns a commercial real estate firm in Atlanta said:</p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;ve still got that &#8216;the white man&#8217;s water is colder&#8217; mentality. We can&#8217;t take us for granted. When we go to our establishments, it&#8217;s almost like we&#8217;re doing a favor. That ought to be a given for us.</p></blockquote>
<p>And here I thought that we were all Americans.  <strong>I guess some people DO still judge people by the color of their skin and not the content of their character.</strong> While it is of course their right to patronize any store of their choice, one hopes that the cries of racism include condemnation of these racists.  To judge from this article there are plenty of racists out there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2009/05/12/andersons-buy-black-becomes-a-national-racist-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party Slogans</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/04/15/tea-party-slogans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2009/04/15/tea-party-slogans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the signs from the tea parties across the United States earlier today:
Spread my Work Ethic, not my wealth!
Change&#8230;giving freeloaders some of what YOU have worked hard for!
Help me Obama, They want me to work and stuff!
Cut taxes, not deals
What part of &#8220;limited powers&#8221; do you not understand?
It&#8217;s my birthday, and all Obama got [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the signs from the tea parties across the United States earlier today:</p>
<blockquote><p>Spread my Work Ethic, not my wealth!</p>
<p>Change&#8230;giving freeloaders some of what YOU have worked hard for!</p>
<p>Help me Obama, They want me to work and stuff!</p>
<p>Cut taxes, not deals</p>
<p>What part of &#8220;limited powers&#8221; do you not understand?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s my birthday, and all Obama got me was more debt!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s my birthday, and all Obama got me was more taxes!</p>
<p>Why make a corrupt government even BIGGER?</p>
<p>Why should I pay for your bad decisions?</p>
<p>Party like its 1773</p>
<p>Obamanomics &#8211; Trickle up poverty</p>
<p>Term Limits for Congress!</p>
<p>A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul. George Bernard Shaw</p>
<p>No tax cuts for non-taxpayers!</p>
<p>Cut taxes, NOT more deal$</p>
<p>Freedom Works!<span id="more-230"></span></p>
<p>Freedom is all the stimulus we need!</p>
<p>Change is all we&#8217;ve got left!</p>
<p>Stop spending money I haven&#8217;t earned yet (seen with a 10 year old)</p>
<p>Free speech is not extremism</p>
<p>You are not spending Monopoly Money!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep the freedom, you keep the change</p>
<p>Wall Street got a Bailout, Bailout, Bailout, all I got was the bill!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t tax me Bro!</p>
<p>Insanity is trying socialism over and over again and expecting a different result.</p>
<p>As government expands, liberty contracts.  Ronald Reagan, Jan 1989</p>
<p>&#8220;DHS Approved&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Welcome Right Wing Extremists&#8221;</p>
<p>If we all paid taxes, we&#8217;d ALL be equal.</p>
<p>Get the Pirates out of Washington</p>
<p>Give me liberty, not debt</p>
<p>Wake up and smell the dictator</p>
<p>The worst Pirat is Obamunism</p>
<p>Pork for breakfast, not for Congress</p>
<p>If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it is free!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not an ATM, Mr. President.</p>
<p>Right wing extremists: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin</p>
<p>Mr. President: FYI, we stopped BOWING to Kings after 1776</p>
<p>ACORN: Seed of the Obamanut Tree</p>
<p>SOS: Stop Obscene Spending</p>
<p>It&#8217;s NOON, do you know where you Wallet is?</p>
<p>A society of sheep eventually begets a government of wolves.</p>
<p>The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people&#8217;s money</p>
<p>Free minds demand free markets.</p>
<p>I am an American, NO and Extremist!</p>
<p>Free markets, not free-loaders!</p>
<p>My paycheck is NOT your piggybank</p>
<p>DHS warns about &#8220;disgruntled military veterans.&#8221;  Is that how we support our troops?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2009/04/15/tea-party-slogans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama targets Rush Limbaugh.</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/03/04/obama-targets-rush-limbaugh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2009/03/04/obama-targets-rush-limbaugh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While obvious for some time, the Politico (Politico) today confirms that President Obama is targeting Rush Limbaugh.
What Obama fails to realize is that this means that Rush begins to set the agenda for the Democrats and in that case they are going to have a tough time of it.  Rush has three hours per day on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While obvious for some time, the Politico (<a title="Politico" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/19596.html" target="_blank">Politico</a>) today confirms that President Obama is targeting Rush Limbaugh.</p>
<p>What Obama fails to realize is that this means that Rush begins to set the agenda for the Democrats and in that case they are going to have a tough time of it.  Rush has three hours per day on the air to respond so anyone willing to listen to him will hear the truth instead of the Obama and mainstream media&#8217;s spin.  While good for Rush, letting him set the agenda will be bad for the President.</p>
<p>It should also be noted that:</p>
<ol>
<li>Enemies lists are not acceptable.  President Nixon would be proud.</li>
<li>It is now acceptable for the President to target private citizens (well, it was before just ask &#8220;Joe the Plumber&#8221;).  Imagine if it were you next and had no way to respond.</li>
<li>It is acceptable for the President of the United States to take what a private citizen says out of context and publicize it.  Amazing and scary.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2009/03/04/obama-targets-rush-limbaugh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
