<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rights.com &#187; First Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rights.com/category/first-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rights.com</link>
	<description>Individual rights and today's issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:08:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Prankster has to find out about Verizon&#8217;s privacy policy from CEO</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/08/31/prankster-has-to-find-out-about-verizons-privacy-policy-from-ceo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/08/31/prankster-has-to-find-out-about-verizons-privacy-policy-from-ceo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing the Right Thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is great (we may be posting a funny story detailing how Verizon attorneys do not know the difference between singular (no, not Cingular) and plural). For the full story, go here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great (we may be posting a funny story detailing how Verizon attorneys do not know the difference between singular (no, not Cingular) and plural).  For the <a href="http://www.zug.com/pranks/verizon/" target="_blank">full story, go her</a>e.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iFdO9x8bjmg?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iFdO9x8bjmg?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/08/31/prankster-has-to-find-out-about-verizons-privacy-policy-from-ceo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Baucus admits to not reading bills he votes on</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/08/25/senator-baucus-admits-to-not-reading-bills-he-votes-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/08/25/senator-baucus-admits-to-not-reading-bills-he-votes-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doing the Right Thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I don’t think you want me to waste my time to read every page of the health care bill. You know why? It’s statutory language.  We hire experts.”  Senator Max Baucus, Democrat, Montana, August 24, 2010 You are a disgrace to the title "Senator" and should be ashamed of yourself. Senator Baucus should resign.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“I don’t think you want me to waste my time to read every page of the health care bill. You know why? It’s statutory language.  We hire experts.”  <a href="http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/main/print/libby_residents_relate_gains_drawbacks_of_asbestos_aid/" target="_blank">Senator Max Baucus, Democrat, Montana, August 24, 2010</a></p></blockquote>
<p>You are a disgrace to the title "Senator" and should be ashamed of yourself. Senator Baucus should resign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/08/25/senator-baucus-admits-to-not-reading-bills-he-votes-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will McCain fool Arizona voters once again?</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/08/24/will-mccain-fool-arizona-voters-once-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/08/24/will-mccain-fool-arizona-voters-once-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doing the Right Thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The headline AP "McCain, Tacking Right, Seeks Primary Victory" says all you need to know to understand Senator McCain.  When you have no core values and no core principles, it is easy to "tack right."  McCain is a duplicitous politician who is willing to change his views depending upon the direction of the wind in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The headline AP "<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/24/mccain-aiming-right-seeks-victory-primary/" target="_blank">McCain, Tacking Right, Seeks Primary Victory</a>" says all you need to know to understand Senator McCain.  When you have no core values and no core principles, it is easy to "tack right."  McCain is a duplicitous politician who is willing to change his views depending upon the direction of the wind in order to retain his power.  The McCain voting record speaks for itself and it is foolish to think that "this time is different" and McCain won't turn into a RINO after the polls close today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/08/24/will-mccain-fool-arizona-voters-once-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1099 Your Freedom Away &#8211; Reporting everything to the IRS with 1099s</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/07/22/1099-your-freedom-away-reporting-everything-to-the-irs-with-1099s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/07/22/1099-your-freedom-away-reporting-everything-to-the-irs-with-1099s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beginning January 1, 2012, you will be required to report just about everything to the IRS.  There has been some discussion recently about this in relation to gold, but it applies to everything if you purchase in aggregate over $600.  In other words purchases that add up to more than $600 over the course of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beginning January 1, 2012, you will be required to report just about everything to the IRS.  There has been some discussion recently about this in relation to gold, but it applies to <strong>everything if you purchase in aggregate over $600</strong>.  In other words purchases that add up to more than $600 over the course of a year require IRS form 1099 to be filed.  It applies to "all persons engaged in business."  Clean someone's house?  Mow a lawn?  Write an article?  Write a program?  Graphic design?  Realtor?</p>
<p>So if a  person buys a computer on January 1st for $399, paper and ink and printer for more than $202 on December 31st of that year from the same person or business (flea market, Bill's Computer Condo, Office Depot) for their office, they are required to file IRS Form 1099.  Forgot about it over <span id="more-1814"></span>the course of the year?  Too bad, you are breaking the law.</p>
<p>If a business or individual pays you more than $600 in a YEAR to clean their offices, they'll be required to 1099 you.  Buy more than $600 in goods from the grocery store in a year for your business?  Form 1099.  Think about it, do you buy bottles of water or soda or snacks to give out to clients or employees?</p>
<p>Are you a freelance writer or designer?  A Doctor or lawyer?  Buy a a 3G iPad?  You will be required to send a 1099 to Apple (all the 3Gs are over $600).  But a Wifi iPad and some songs and apps from Apple iTunes/App Store?  Form 1099.  Realtor?  Your MLS fee's over $600?  1099.  Fish tank in your orthodontic office (our's does)?  1099 to the maintenance company.  Buy a new desk and chair?  1099.  How many people and companies do you have to track?  Will you just consolidate to a few large ones to avoid the paperwork?  So long to a bunch of small businesses.</p>
<p>Buy Starbucks a few times a week for an employee as a reward?  That is about $650 per year if you buy it every other day.  You will have to send Starbucks a 1099.  If you are paying by credit card, it can be - and will be - tracked.</p>
<p>This isn't just anti-business.  It is anti-freedom.  No one who wants to live in a free country wants all their transactions reported to the Federal Government - or to anyone.  People say "But I have nothing to hide, so what is the big deal?"  Okay, we'll be over to install a camera in your bedroom - if you aren't a pedophile, you have nothing to hide, right?  I'd also like copies of your bank accounts and credit card statements.  This is not about "I have nothing to hide," it is about freedom.  Even ignoring how outrageous this concept is and the Constitutionality of it, the fact that in a free country anyone would put up with transaction monitoring at all, let alone this intrusively says a lot about the goals of the people who are advocating it.  It is about <strong><em>control and power</em></strong> over you and the country.  Sure, it starts out as for a "good cause"(tm), but ends up consolidating power and control in a small group of people who want nothing more than the power of life and death over every aspect of the country.</p>
<p>The next will be:  "this is a tremendous burden on people and businesses, so we will just have the credit card companies automatically add up the totals for you and submit them to the IRS electronically.  And as long as we are <!--more-->doing that, why not track everything since those purchases under $600 per year 'lost revenue.'"</p>
<p>It is totalitarianism, all in the name of a "good cause."  It turns us into a nation of snitches - you better file your 1099 because the person on the other end of the transaction will be doing so.  There was a lot of complaining about the Patriot Act monitoring people, but this makes the Patriot Act look like a puddle next to the Pacific.</p>
<p>Here is the language, amendments are in italics and highlighted.</p>
<blockquote>
<div id="_mcePaste">TITLE 26 &gt; Subtitle F &gt; CHAPTER 61 &gt; Subchapter A &gt; PART III &gt; Subpart B &gt; § 6041. Information at source</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">(a) Payments of $600 or more</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">All persons engaged in a trade or business and making payment in the course of such trade or business to another person, of rent, salaries, wages,<strong><em> amounts in consideration for property</em></strong>, premiums, annuities, compensations, remunerations, emoluments, or other <strong>gross proceeds</strong>, fixed or determinable gains, profits, and income (other than payments to which section 6042 (a)(1), 6044 (a)(1), 6047 (e), 6049 (a), or 6050N (a) applies, and other than payments with respect to which a statement is required under the authority of section 6042 (a)(2), 6044 (a)(2), or 6045), of $600 or more in any taxable year, or, in the case of such payments made by the United States, the officers or employees of the United States having information as to such payments and required to make returns in regard thereto by the regulations hereinafter provided for, shall render a true and accurate return to the Secretary, under such regulations and in such form and manner and to such extent as may be prescribed by the Secretary, setting forth the amount of such <strong>gross proceeds</strong>, gains, profits, and income, and the name and address of the recipient of such payment.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">...</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><strong>(h) Application to Corporations.</strong></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><strong>Notwithstanding any regulation prescribed by the Secretary before the date of the enactment of this subsection, for purposes of this section the term `person' includes any corporation that is not an organization exempt from tax under section 501(a).</strong></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><strong>(i) Regulations.</strong></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><strong>The Secretary may prescribe such regulations and other guidance as may be appropriate or necessary to carry out the purposes of this section, including rules to prevent duplicative reporting of transactions.</strong></div>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/07/22/1099-your-freedom-away-reporting-everything-to-the-irs-with-1099s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A standing military force with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defense against foreign danger have been always the instruments of tyranny at home.</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/07/21/a-standing-military-force-with-an-overgrown-executive-will-not-long-be-safe-companions-to-liberty-the-means-of-defense-against-foreign-danger-have-been-always-the-instruments-of-tyranny-at-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/07/21/a-standing-military-force-with-an-overgrown-executive-will-not-long-be-safe-companions-to-liberty-the-means-of-defense-against-foreign-danger-have-been-always-the-instruments-of-tyranny-at-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brutality by Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A standing military force with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defense against foreign danger have been always the instruments of tyranny at home.  James Madison]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A standing military force with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defense against foreign danger have been always the instruments of tyranny at home.  James Madison</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/07/21/a-standing-military-force-with-an-overgrown-executive-will-not-long-be-safe-companions-to-liberty-the-means-of-defense-against-foreign-danger-have-been-always-the-instruments-of-tyranny-at-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kagan Declines to say government has no power to tell Americans what to eat!</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/06/29/kagan-declines-to-say-government-has-no-power-to-tell-americans-what-to-eat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/06/29/kagan-declines-to-say-government-has-no-power-to-tell-americans-what-to-eat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When asked to state whether the United States Constitution allows the Federal Government to mandate that people consume certain foods every day, Kagan would not say it did not. So much for the concept of "enumerated powers," "limited government," and the entire Constitution. Kagan has obviously no interest in the Constitution itself, merely her own [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When asked to state whether the United States Constitution allows the Federal Government to mandate that people consume certain foods every day, Kagan would not say it did not.  So much for the concept of "enumerated powers," "limited government," and the entire Constitution.  Kagan has obviously no interest in the Constitution itself, merely her own <strong>power</strong>.  What a disgrace to the concept of a Justice.  Her view is judging by whim, not law.</p>
<p>Fascism at its best. Despots, tyrants, marxists, socialists and other dictators would love a woman who believed there was nothing the government couldn't do - from ignoring the First Amendment to telling you what to eat.</p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DSoWGlyugTo&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DSoWGlyugTo&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/06/29/kagan-declines-to-say-government-has-no-power-to-tell-americans-what-to-eat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post and &#8220;Retards&#8221; and &#8220;PaulTards&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/06/24/washington-post-and-retards-and-paultards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/06/24/washington-post-and-retards-and-paultards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doing the Right Thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama White House Chief of Staff called supporters "f-ing retard" and the Washington Post calls Ron Paul supporters "Paultards"  ("... pumping around the clock to get Paultard Tea Party people on TV.") You have to wonder about the low journalistic standards at the Washington Post.  Well, no, actually there is no need to wonder.  Classing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama White House Chief of Staff called supporters "f-ing retard" and the Washington Post calls Ron Paul supporters "Paultards"  ("... pumping around the clock to get Paultard Tea Party people on TV.")</p>
<p>You have to wonder about the low journalistic standards at the Washington Post.  Well, no, actually there is no need to wonder.  Classing the anti-freedom stenographers at the Washington Post "journalists" is an insult to true journalists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/06/24/washington-post-and-retards-and-paultards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Helen Thomas tells Jews to go back to Germany</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/06/03/helen-thomas-tells-jews-to-go-back-to-germany/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/06/03/helen-thomas-tells-jews-to-go-back-to-germany/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 04:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Helen Thomas tells Jews to go back to Germany. Once Helen Thomas, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barack Obama and the rest of Congress and the administration return to the native lands of their forefathers, then they can bring this up. After all, if you go back far enough no one is from the United States. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helen Thomas tells Jews to go back to Germany.  Once Helen Thomas, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barack Obama and the rest of Congress and the administration return to the native lands of their forefathers, then they can bring this up.  After all, if you go back far enough no one is from the United States.  If you only go back 500 years, well, everyone knows the history.  How long has there been a Jewish presence in Israel?  4000 years or more?  </p>
<p>Helen Thomas, racist and anti-semite.</p>
<blockquote><p>Helen Thomas says: "Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine. Remember, these people are occupied and it's their land. Not Germany. Not Poland."  When asked what the Jews should do, Thomas said "They go home. Poland. Germany. And America and everywhere else."
</p></blockquote>
<p>Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail??blogid=95&#038;entry_id=65122#ixzz0q0LfPFZ7<br />
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RQcQdWBqt14&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RQcQdWBqt14&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/06/03/helen-thomas-tells-jews-to-go-back-to-germany/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crist &#8211; a dishonest, unprincipled, power-hungry, lying, opportunist of a politician.</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/06/02/crist-a-dishonest-unprincipled-power-hungry-lying-opportunist-of-a-politician/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/06/02/crist-a-dishonest-unprincipled-power-hungry-lying-opportunist-of-a-politician/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doing the Right Thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crist complains it is "lonely" on the campaign trail and that his "friends" didn't support his change of party.  A betraying politician and doesn't understand why.  Crist's problems are multi-fold: 1. He lied to voters and his "friends" in the Republican party repeatedly in 2010. When it didn't look like he had a chance of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/100947-crist-says-hes-lonely-out-on-campaign-trail?page=4#comments" target="_blank">Crist complains</a> it is "lonely" on the campaign trail and that his "friends" didn't support his change of party.  A betraying politician and doesn't understand why.  Crist's problems are multi-fold:</p>
<p>1. He lied to voters and his "friends" in the Republican party repeatedly in 2010.  When it didn't look like he had a chance of winning, he broke his repeated promises.  Now he doesn't understand why any one with an ounce of honesty and character wants anything to do with him?  Well, that just adds STUPIDITY to Crist's flaws.</p>
<p>2. Crist ran on a party with principles based on freedom and then betrayed that.  It shows Crist has one principle: POWER FOR HIMSELF.  If he thinks that party is "too far right" it means that he is willing to sell out some of your freedom to gain power for himself instead of defending liberty.  Who wants a politician who is more concerned with his own power than your freedom?</p>
<p>3. "Lonely"?  Come on, be a man Charlie.  Stop crying about the consequences of the choices you made.  We elected someone who complains about being "lonely" on the campaign trail?  Come on, how old is Charlie Crist?  Four? Five?</p>
<p>4. Crist didn't leave because of principles, he left because he couldn't win.  Hearing Crist talk about principles is like hearing Mao talk about his fondness for liberty.  Why would ANYONE vote for someone who has NO PRINCIPLES?  You will have no idea who you are voting for, except someone who will do what is best, best for himself that is.</p>
<p>Sorry, Charlie, Florida wants politicians who are (a) honest, (b) keep their word, and (c) are willing to fight for freedom, not power.  Crist is none of those: he is an dishonest, unprincipled, power-hungry, lying, opportunist of a politician.  And since he doesn't understand why he is unpopular after lying repeatedly to the citizens and voters of Florida, he must be stupid too.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial, tahoma, sans-serif; color: #444444;"><span style="border-collapse: collapse; line-height: normal; white-space: pre-wrap;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; color: #000000;"><span style="border-collapse: separate; line-height: 19px; white-space: normal;"><br />
</span></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/06/02/crist-a-dishonest-unprincipled-power-hungry-lying-opportunist-of-a-politician/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Socialism and freedom do not mix.</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/05/10/socialism-and-freedom-do-not-mix-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/05/10/socialism-and-freedom-do-not-mix-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Socialism and freedom do not mix.  Fascism and freedom do not mix.  Communism and freedom do not mix.  Freedom can not exist in a state that is socialist, fascist, or communist.  Anyone concerned about liberty must be a foe of any totalitarian ideology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Socialism and freedom do not mix.  Fascism and freedom do not mix.  Communism and freedom do not mix.  Freedom can not exist in a state that is socialist, fascist, or communist.  Anyone concerned about liberty must be a foe of any totalitarian ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/05/10/socialism-and-freedom-do-not-mix-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
