<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rights.com &#187; privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rights.com/category/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rights.com</link>
	<description>Individual rights and today's issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:08:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>1099 Your Freedom Away &#8211; Reporting everything to the IRS with 1099s</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/07/22/1099-your-freedom-away-reporting-everything-to-the-irs-with-1099s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/07/22/1099-your-freedom-away-reporting-everything-to-the-irs-with-1099s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beginning January 1, 2012, you will be required to report just about everything to the IRS.  There has been some discussion recently about this in relation to gold, but it applies to everything if you purchase in aggregate over $600.  In other words purchases that add up to more than $600 over the course of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beginning January 1, 2012, you will be required to report just about everything to the IRS.  There has been some discussion recently about this in relation to gold, but it applies to <strong>everything if you purchase in aggregate over $600</strong>.  In other words purchases that add up to more than $600 over the course of a year require IRS form 1099 to be filed.  It applies to "all persons engaged in business."  Clean someone's house?  Mow a lawn?  Write an article?  Write a program?  Graphic design?  Realtor?</p>
<p>So if a  person buys a computer on January 1st for $399, paper and ink and printer for more than $202 on December 31st of that year from the same person or business (flea market, Bill's Computer Condo, Office Depot) for their office, they are required to file IRS Form 1099.  Forgot about it over <span id="more-1814"></span>the course of the year?  Too bad, you are breaking the law.</p>
<p>If a business or individual pays you more than $600 in a YEAR to clean their offices, they'll be required to 1099 you.  Buy more than $600 in goods from the grocery store in a year for your business?  Form 1099.  Think about it, do you buy bottles of water or soda or snacks to give out to clients or employees?</p>
<p>Are you a freelance writer or designer?  A Doctor or lawyer?  Buy a a 3G iPad?  You will be required to send a 1099 to Apple (all the 3Gs are over $600).  But a Wifi iPad and some songs and apps from Apple iTunes/App Store?  Form 1099.  Realtor?  Your MLS fee's over $600?  1099.  Fish tank in your orthodontic office (our's does)?  1099 to the maintenance company.  Buy a new desk and chair?  1099.  How many people and companies do you have to track?  Will you just consolidate to a few large ones to avoid the paperwork?  So long to a bunch of small businesses.</p>
<p>Buy Starbucks a few times a week for an employee as a reward?  That is about $650 per year if you buy it every other day.  You will have to send Starbucks a 1099.  If you are paying by credit card, it can be - and will be - tracked.</p>
<p>This isn't just anti-business.  It is anti-freedom.  No one who wants to live in a free country wants all their transactions reported to the Federal Government - or to anyone.  People say "But I have nothing to hide, so what is the big deal?"  Okay, we'll be over to install a camera in your bedroom - if you aren't a pedophile, you have nothing to hide, right?  I'd also like copies of your bank accounts and credit card statements.  This is not about "I have nothing to hide," it is about freedom.  Even ignoring how outrageous this concept is and the Constitutionality of it, the fact that in a free country anyone would put up with transaction monitoring at all, let alone this intrusively says a lot about the goals of the people who are advocating it.  It is about <strong><em>control and power</em></strong> over you and the country.  Sure, it starts out as for a "good cause"(tm), but ends up consolidating power and control in a small group of people who want nothing more than the power of life and death over every aspect of the country.</p>
<p>The next will be:  "this is a tremendous burden on people and businesses, so we will just have the credit card companies automatically add up the totals for you and submit them to the IRS electronically.  And as long as we are <!--more-->doing that, why not track everything since those purchases under $600 per year 'lost revenue.'"</p>
<p>It is totalitarianism, all in the name of a "good cause."  It turns us into a nation of snitches - you better file your 1099 because the person on the other end of the transaction will be doing so.  There was a lot of complaining about the Patriot Act monitoring people, but this makes the Patriot Act look like a puddle next to the Pacific.</p>
<p>Here is the language, amendments are in italics and highlighted.</p>
<blockquote>
<div id="_mcePaste">TITLE 26 &gt; Subtitle F &gt; CHAPTER 61 &gt; Subchapter A &gt; PART III &gt; Subpart B &gt; § 6041. Information at source</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">(a) Payments of $600 or more</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">All persons engaged in a trade or business and making payment in the course of such trade or business to another person, of rent, salaries, wages,<strong><em> amounts in consideration for property</em></strong>, premiums, annuities, compensations, remunerations, emoluments, or other <strong>gross proceeds</strong>, fixed or determinable gains, profits, and income (other than payments to which section 6042 (a)(1), 6044 (a)(1), 6047 (e), 6049 (a), or 6050N (a) applies, and other than payments with respect to which a statement is required under the authority of section 6042 (a)(2), 6044 (a)(2), or 6045), of $600 or more in any taxable year, or, in the case of such payments made by the United States, the officers or employees of the United States having information as to such payments and required to make returns in regard thereto by the regulations hereinafter provided for, shall render a true and accurate return to the Secretary, under such regulations and in such form and manner and to such extent as may be prescribed by the Secretary, setting forth the amount of such <strong>gross proceeds</strong>, gains, profits, and income, and the name and address of the recipient of such payment.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">...</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><strong>(h) Application to Corporations.</strong></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><strong>Notwithstanding any regulation prescribed by the Secretary before the date of the enactment of this subsection, for purposes of this section the term `person' includes any corporation that is not an organization exempt from tax under section 501(a).</strong></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><strong>(i) Regulations.</strong></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><strong>The Secretary may prescribe such regulations and other guidance as may be appropriate or necessary to carry out the purposes of this section, including rules to prevent duplicative reporting of transactions.</strong></div>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/07/22/1099-your-freedom-away-reporting-everything-to-the-irs-with-1099s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A standing military force with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defense against foreign danger have been always the instruments of tyranny at home.</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/07/21/a-standing-military-force-with-an-overgrown-executive-will-not-long-be-safe-companions-to-liberty-the-means-of-defense-against-foreign-danger-have-been-always-the-instruments-of-tyranny-at-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/07/21/a-standing-military-force-with-an-overgrown-executive-will-not-long-be-safe-companions-to-liberty-the-means-of-defense-against-foreign-danger-have-been-always-the-instruments-of-tyranny-at-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brutality by Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A standing military force with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defense against foreign danger have been always the instruments of tyranny at home.  James Madison]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A standing military force with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defense against foreign danger have been always the instruments of tyranny at home.  James Madison</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/07/21/a-standing-military-force-with-an-overgrown-executive-will-not-long-be-safe-companions-to-liberty-the-means-of-defense-against-foreign-danger-have-been-always-the-instruments-of-tyranny-at-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Rolls out encrypted web search option</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/05/25/google-rolls-out-encrypted-web-search-option/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/05/25/google-rolls-out-encrypted-web-search-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing the Right Thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cnet reports that Google has rolled out an encrypted web search option.  We just have to point out that Phonebook.com has had an encrypted people search and encrypted web search option for years at https://www.phonebook.com/ It is good to see that Google is offering this option.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cnet reports that Google has rolled out an encrypted <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20005636-245.html?tag=mncol;title" target="_blank">web search option</a>.  We just have to point out that Phonebook.com has had an <a href="https://www.phonebook.com/">encrypted people search</a> and <a href="https://www.phonebook.com/">encrypted web search</a> option for years at <a href="https://www.phonebook.com/">https://www.phonebook.com/</a></p>
<p>It is good to see that Google is offering this option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/05/25/google-rolls-out-encrypted-web-search-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Southwest airlines privacy policy ignored.</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/05/16/southwest-airlines-privacy-policy-ignored/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/05/16/southwest-airlines-privacy-policy-ignored/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 16:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Southwest Airlines sends someone else's flight details and provides (a) no means to notify them and (b) no means to unsubscribe. Great privacy policy, Southwest. And they say they don't care if it is published: Receipt and Itinerary as of 05/16/10 2:05 PM Confirmation Number QZHCEW Confirmation Date: 05/16/10 Received: WN/CARL RILEY BY ICBM Be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Southwest Airlines sends someone else's flight details and provides (a) no means to notify them and (b) no means to unsubscribe.  Great privacy policy, Southwest.  And they say they don't care if it is published:</p>
<p>Receipt and Itinerary as of 05/16/10 2:05 PM<br />
Confirmation Number<br />
QZHCEW</p>
<p>Confirmation Date: 05/16/10<br />
Received: WN/CARL RILEY BY ICBM</p>
<p>Be prepared when you get there!<br />
Consult Travel Guide for <span id="more-1587"></span>relevant<br />
tips from real travelers.</p>
<p> Passenger Information<br />
 Passenger Name 	 Account Number 	 Ticket# 	 Expiration1<br />
WETHINGTON/JAKE	- None Entered -	5262100650735	05/16/11<br />
1 All travel involving funds from this Confirmation Number must be completed by the expiration date.</p>
<p> Itinerary<br />
 Depart: ST LOUIS MO to HOUSTON HOBBY   ( Travel Time: 2 hrs 10 mins )<br />
 Date 	 Flight 	Routing Details<br />
Mon Jun 21	# 3038	Depart ST LOUIS MO (STL) at 5:00 PM<br />
Arrive in HOUSTON HOBBY (HOU) at 7:10 PM<br />
 Return: HOUSTON HOBBY to ST LOUIS MO   ( Travel Time: 2 hrs )<br />
 Date 	 Flight 	Routing Details<br />
Sun Jun 27	# 0954	Depart HOUSTON HOBBY (HOU) at 3:30 PM<br />
Arrive in ST LOUIS MO (STL) at 5:30 PM<br />
 Cost and Payment Summary<br />
Base Fare	$261.39<br />
+ Excise Taxes	$19.61<br />
Advertised Fare	$281.00<br />
+ Segment Fee	$7.40<br />
+ Passenger Facility Fee	$7.50<br />
+ Security Fee1	$5.00<br />
Total Payment:	$300.90</p>
<p>1Security Fee is the government-<br />
imposed September 11th Security Fee.</p>
<p>  Current payment(s)<br />
    05/16/10 Amer Express XXXXXXXXXXX3008 $300.90</p>
<p> Fare Rule(s)<br />
All travel involving funds from this Confirmation Number must be completed by the expiration date. Any change to this itinerary may result in a fare increase.</p>
<p>Fare Calculation:</p>
<p>STL WN HOU124.65S14NTNR WN STL136.74M14NTNR 261.39 END ZPSTLHOU XFSTL4.5HOU3 AY5.00$STL2.50 HOU2.50</p>
<p> Important Checkin Requirement<br />
Passengers who do not obtain a boarding pass and are not present and available for boarding in the departure gate area at least ten minutes prior to scheduled departure time may have their reserved space cancelled and will not be eligible for denied boarding compensation.</p>
<p> Southwest Airlines Co. Notice of Incorporated Terms<br />
Air transportation by Southwest Airlines is subject to Southwest Airlines' Passenger Contract of Carriage, the terms of which are incorporated by reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/05/16/southwest-airlines-privacy-policy-ignored/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Throw out the old flag along with the Constitution&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/03/21/throw-out-the-old-flag-along-with-the-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/03/21/throw-out-the-old-flag-along-with-the-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama-Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=1252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the "Health Insurance" vote, it has become clear of the two major parties, there is one party of freedom and one party of totalitarianism.  Anyone intellectually honest knows the Constitution prohibits government actions such as this (or the Patriot Act for that matter). To see a document of enumerated, limited powers twisted into the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the "Health Insurance" vote, it has become clear of the two major parties, there is one party of freedom and one party of totalitarianism.  Anyone intellectually honest knows the Constitution prohibits government actions such as this (or the Patriot Act for that matter). To see a document of enumerated, limited powers twisted into the opposite by power-hungry politicians sworn to protect and defend it is disgusting. The Founders are not just spinning in their graves, they have spun so fast they have completely disintegrated.  Just like the protections in the Constitution.</p>
<p>So, the United States can now throw out the old flag while Congress throws out the last vestiges of the Constitution.  As such, a more modern flag is needed.  Several contenders to replace the old "Stars and Stripes" with a more timely flag are shown below.</p>
<p>Which do you prefer?  Let us know in the comments!</p>
<div id="attachment_1253" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.rights.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/sickle1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1253" title="Sickle and Strips" src="http://www.rights.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/sickle1-300x170.jpg" alt="Sickle and Strips" width="300" height="170" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sickle and Stripes - Option 1</p></div>
<div id="attachment_1254" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.rights.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/sickle2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1254" title="Stars, Sickle and Stripes" src="http://www.rights.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/sickle2-300x170.jpg" alt="Stars, Sickle and Stripes" width="300" height="170" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Stars, Sickle and Stripes - Option 2</p></div>
<div id="attachment_1255" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.rights.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/sickle3.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1255" title="Star-sickle and Stripes" src="http://www.rights.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/sickle3-300x170.jpg" alt="Star-sickle and Stripes" width="300" height="170" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Star-sickle and Stripes - Option 3</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/03/21/throw-out-the-old-flag-along-with-the-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T and Mordecai Alpert again</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/01/15/att-and-mordecai-alpert-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/01/15/att-and-mordecai-alpert-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Moved to Jan 15, 2010 so it shows up lower on the site] After numerous calls over the last few months, including several emails to privacy@att.com and assurances from them that they do protect client privacy, AT&#38;T sent us Mordecai Alpert's payment information from today.  AT&#38;T has still refused to answer questions regarding how little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Moved to Jan 15, 2010 so it shows up lower on the site]</p>
<p>After numerous calls over the last few months, including several emails to privacy@att.com and assurances from them that they do protect client privacy, AT&amp;T sent us Mordecai Alpert's payment information from today.  AT&amp;T has still refused to answer questions regarding how little they are doing to protect Mordecai Alpert's privacy.</p>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote>
<div>Thank You</div>
<div>Hello MORDECAI ALPERT,</p>
<p>Your payment has been received and will be applied to your wireless account.</p>
<ul>
<li>Amount: 142.49</li>
<li>Date: 01/22/2010</li>
<li>Confirmation number: QPCODT618700871</li>
</ul>
<p>We appreciate your business.</p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
AT&amp;T</p>
</div>
<div>This e-mail was auto generated. Please do not respond.</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/01/15/att-and-mordecai-alpert-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T sends us Mordecai Alpert&#8217;s information again</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2010/01/08/att-sends-us-mordecai-alperts-information-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2010/01/08/att-sends-us-mordecai-alperts-information-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great privacy on AT&#38;T's part.  So, Mordecai Alpert, please call AT&#38;T.  The AT&#38;T representative said they didn't care if the information was posted and that they couldn't do anything to correct the problem without talking to Mordecai Alpert (in Delray, FL) since he is the account owner.  So, Mordecai, please call AT&#38;T and ask them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great privacy on AT&amp;T's part.  So, Mordecai Alpert, please call AT&amp;T.  The AT&amp;T representative said they didn't care if the information was posted and that they couldn't do anything to correct the problem without talking to Mordecai Alpert (in Delray, FL) since he is the account owner.  So, Mordecai, please call AT&amp;T and ask them (a) why they do NOT verify email addresses, and (b) do not provide a link to let them know they are sending it to the wrong address.  Most importantly, ask them why they don't follow their own privacy policy better.</p>
<blockquote><p>Hello MORDECAI ALPERT:</p>
<p>Please contact AT&amp;T Wireless regarding account number 523024065xxx at 1-800-947-5096. Thank You.</p>
<p>-------------------------------</p>
<div id="_mcePaste">Your Wireless Bill is Ready Online</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Hello MORDECAI ALPERT,</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Your monthly wireless bill (for account 523024065xxx ) is now available for review online.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Log in today to view your bill and make a payment.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Thank You,</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">AT&amp;T</div>
<p>Your Wireless Bill is Ready Online</p>
<p>Hello MORDECAI ALPERT,<br />
Your monthly wireless bill (for account 523024065xxx ) is now available for review online.Log in today to view your bill and make a payment.<br />
Thank You,AT&amp;T</p>
<p>-----------------Update, January 11, 2010:</p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: normal; border-collapse: collapse;"> </span></p>
<div style="width: 760px; border: initial none initial;">
<div style="width: 746px; border-right-width: 2px; border-bottom-width: 2px; border-left-width: 2px; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; border-right-color: #cccccc; border-bottom-color: #cccccc; border-left-color: #cccccc; border-top-style: none; border-top-width: initial; border-top-color: initial; background-color: #ffffff;">
<div style="width: 700px;">
<div>Thank You</div>
<div style="width: 445px;">Hello MORDECAI ALPERT,</p>
<p>Your payment has been received and will be applied to your wireless account.</p>
<ul>
<li style="margin-left: 15px;">Amount: 142.49</li>
<li style="margin-left: 15px;">Date: 01/11/2010</li>
<li style="margin-left: 15px;">Confirmation number: QPCODT613957xxx</li>
</ul>
<p>We appreciate your business.</p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
AT&amp;T</p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding-left: 15px;">This e-mail was auto generated. Please do not respond.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="width: 340px; text-align: left;">
<div><a style="color: #0000cc;" href="http://click.wireless.att.com:8080/83616104.108580.835370972.542" target="_blank">Privacy Policy</a> | <a style="color: #0000cc;" href="http://click.wireless.att.com:8080/83616104.108580.835370972.242" target="_blank">Terms of Use</a></div>
</div>
<div style="width: 380px; text-align: right;">
<div>©2009 AT&amp;T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&amp;T and the AT&amp;T logo are trademarks of AT&amp;T Intellectual Property.</div>
</div>
<p><img alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2010/01/08/att-sends-us-mordecai-alperts-information-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AirTran A+ Visa card from Barclay Card for Burton Stevens!</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/12/24/airtran-a-visa-card-from-barclay-card-for-burton-stevens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2009/12/24/airtran-a-visa-card-from-barclay-card-for-burton-stevens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet again a credit card company notifies us of someone else's new Visa. AirTran A+ Visa card from Barclay Card (barclaycardus.com, of the Barclay's Group) notified us today of someone else's Visa approval. While Barclays claims to have a privacy policy, they don't seem to follow it nor do they give links to notify them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet again a credit card company notifies us of someone else's new Visa.   AirTran A+ Visa card from Barclay Card (barclaycardus.com, of the Barclay's Group) notified us today of someone else's Visa approval.  While Barclays claims to have a privacy policy, they don't seem to follow it nor do they give links to notify them of the problem.</p>
<p>Humorously enough BarclayCardus.com has this message on it today:</p>
<blockquote><p>"At Barclaycard, we never stop envisioning new ways to help our partners cultivate customer loyalty."  </p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-814"></span></p>
<p>We don't suppose that includes protecting AirTran's customers privacy.</p>
<p>This is the email they sent:</p>
<blockquote><p>Dear BURTON,</p>
<p>Welcome! You've been approved for the AirTran Airways A+ Visa Signature card, brought to you by Barclays.</p>
<p>Use your AirTran Airways A+ Visa Signature card to earn points* toward travel on AirTran Airways. Earn one AirTran Credit for every 1,000 points. Soon you'll be flying for free by earning:</p>
<p>Bonus Credits when you use your card**<br />
Points toward travel with every purchase you make<br />
Double points on your AirTran Airways travel purchases<br />
In the next few days, we'll be sending you everything you need to start using your AirTran Airways A+ Visa Signature card. In the meantime, please register online at www.BarclaycardUS.com. Once you've set up your username and password, simply log in to:</p>
<p>View your account balance and transaction summary<br />
Check the status of any balance transfer(s) you may have requested or submit a new balance transfer after you have received and activated your card<br />
If you have any questions regarding your AirTran Airways A+ Visa Signature card, please visit www.BarclaycardUS.com to send us a secure email. Or, visit www.airtran.com to purchase tickets, redeem Credits or sign-up to receive AirTran Airways Net Escapes airfare offers via email.</p>
<p>Thanks for choosing the AirTran Airways A+ Visa Signature card.<br />
Chris Reitnour<br />
Director, Marketing<br />
Barclays</p>
<p>You received this email because you have been approved for the AirTran Airways A+ Visa Signature card.</p>
<p>We're happy to send you occasional emails about Barclays features and benefits, but if you'd prefer not to receive them, please login to www.BarclaycardUS.com and select ALERTS/PROFILE. From the PROFILE screen you can update your PRIVACY OPTIONS. You will continue to receive any Account Alerts that have been set up and any email updates about your account.</p>
<p>* The AirTran Airways A+ Visa Signature card program is sponsored by AirTran Airways.<br />
** Points will be credited to your account at the close of your first billing cycle after use of the AirTran Airways A+ Visa Signature account. Your annual fee must be paid and your account must be in good standing in order to earn points.</p>
<p>Please Do Not Reply to this Email<br />
This is a notification-only email that cannot accept incoming replies. To send us an email, simply log in to www.BarclaycardUS.com, click on CUSTOMER SERVICE and then select EMAIL to send your message securely.</p>
<p>The AirTran Airways A+ Visa Signature card is issued by Barclays Bank Delaware, Attn: Gates - IS, 100 S. West Street, Wilmington, DE 19801, Member FDIC.</p>
<p>BRD-EM-14466051
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2009/12/24/airtran-a-visa-card-from-barclay-card-for-burton-stevens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon keeps sending someone else&#8217;s account information</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/12/09/verizon-keeps-sending-someone-elses-account-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2009/12/09/verizon-keeps-sending-someone-elses-account-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Verizon keeps sending someone else's account information and still pays only lip service to privacy and providing a method to letting them know they are doing so.  Perhaps they should have a coverage map that shows where they are leaking private information.  "Can you see my account information now?"  "Can you see it now?" And [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon keeps sending someone else's account information and still pays only lip service to privacy and providing a method to letting them know they are doing so.  Perhaps they should have a coverage map that shows where they are leaking private information.  "Can you see my account information now?"  "Can you see it now?"<br />
And Verizon won't discuss removing our email address from their database and said they didn't care what we did with information sent to it. [Which fits with our terms of service - anything sent to us may be published.]</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font: normal normal normal 16px/normal Arial; color: #d6001c; text-align: left; font-weight: bold; padding-top: 17px; padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 40px; margin: 0px;">Your Verizon Wireless Account Number ending with 1772-00001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Arial; color: #000000; text-align: left; padding-top: 17px; padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 20px; margin: 0px;">Your current Verizon Wireless bill statement is now available for online viewing. The current balance due is $193.79.You can conveniently view your bill statement at<a style="color: #0000cc;" href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/" target="_blank">www.verizonwireless.com</a>. The online bill is a restatement of your paper bill.</p>
<p>It's easy to pay your Verizon Wireless bill. On the web, go to My Verizon at <a style="color: #0000cc;" href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/" target="_blank">www.verizonwireless.com</a>. On your cellular phone, you can access account information by dialing #PMT (airtime free).</p>
<p>Auto Bill Pay is Available!</p>
<ul>
<li style="margin-left: 15px;">Automatically pay your bill, in full, each month by signing up for Auto Bill Pay using your checking account or debit/credit card. For more information or to change your current payment method, go to My Verizon at<a style="color: #0000cc;" href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/" target="_blank">www.verizonwireless.com</a> and select Auto Bill Pay.</li>
<li style="margin-left: 15px;">Or, call us at 1-866-868-3882 to enroll.</li>
</ul>
<p>Thank you for using Verizon Wireless.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="line-height: normal; font-size: x-small;">...To review our Privacy Policy, <a style="color: #000000;" href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/footer/privacy.jsp" target="_blank">click here</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: normal; font-size: x-small;"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2009/12/09/verizon-keeps-sending-someone-elses-account-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smith Barney, Intuit Payroll, and Amex update</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/11/24/smith-barney-and-amex-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rights.com/2009/11/24/smith-barney-and-amex-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smith Barney sent a welcome message to Harold Bxxxxx, welcoming Harold B to Smith Barney online and another for account number ###-##099 being enrolled in E-Delivery with the last 3 SSN ending in 040.  Smith Barney, like others, links to their privacy policy, and does a wonderful job following it.  They do give an 800 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smith Barney sent a welcome message to Harold Bxxxxx, welcoming Harold B to Smith Barney online and another for account number ###-##099 being enrolled in E-Delivery with the last 3 SSN ending in 040.  Smith Barney, like others, links to their privacy policy, and does a <em>wonderful</em> job following it.  They do give an 800 number (800-221-3636) to call, but no link or email address to notify them.</p>
<p>Next we have Intuit QB Basic Payroll sending order # SBL36468501 for 243.89 to me for Grant Kxxxxx in Boca Raton, Florida with no reply address and no way to notify them that they are sending information to someone else.</p>
<p>An update on the American Express "Settlement and Payment Advice Report for SE No: 9740108691."  American Express is still sending them.  While asking to be notified by email, but messages to their notification email address still bounce.</p>
<p>How about companies adopt a standard link at the end of their emails to notify them to review the address?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rights.com/2009/11/24/smith-barney-and-amex-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
