<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rights.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rights.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rights.com</link>
	<description>Individual rights and today's issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:36:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Sheila Jackson Lee (Democrat) asks if the Mars Pathfinder will take pictures of the flag the astronauts left&#8230; by rnb</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2008/10/14/sheila-jackson-lee-democrat-asks-if-the-mars-pathfinder-will-take-pictures-of-the-flag-the-astronauts-left/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>rnb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=641#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Where is the video or text of Mrs Jackson Lee being quoted ? I can&#039;t find it anywhere on the &#039;net. 

Anyone ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the video or text of Mrs Jackson Lee being quoted ? I can&#8217;t find it anywhere on the &#8216;net. </p>
<p>Anyone ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maria Shriver gets another ticket and runs a stop sign. by Just Sayin'</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/12/18/maria-shriver-gets-another-ticket-and-runs-a-stop-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Sayin'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=811#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Shriver is the epitome of what the vast majority of dems are: A raging HYPOCRITE.  And yes, they are trying to regulate away our freedoms; with *ideals* that may sound good on paper, but in practice would ultimately be detrimental for society (kind of like Communism).  All the while, the elitists would continue to live in splendor, &amp; despite lip-service, are disingenuous on caring about the populace beyond ensuring THEY obey the rules.  Yet Shriver clearly thumbs her own nose at the law, with her sense of arrogant entitlement..  My gosh, when she blew through that stop-sign, she could have killed someone! But then, wouldn&#039;t be the 1st time a Kennedy got away with that, now would it?  She is truly a disgrace &amp; a hazard on the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shriver is the epitome of what the vast majority of dems are: A raging HYPOCRITE.  And yes, they are trying to regulate away our freedoms; with *ideals* that may sound good on paper, but in practice would ultimately be detrimental for society (kind of like Communism).  All the while, the elitists would continue to live in splendor, &amp; despite lip-service, are disingenuous on caring about the populace beyond ensuring THEY obey the rules.  Yet Shriver clearly thumbs her own nose at the law, with her sense of arrogant entitlement..  My gosh, when she blew through that stop-sign, she could have killed someone! But then, wouldn&#8217;t be the 1st time a Kennedy got away with that, now would it?  She is truly a disgrace &amp; a hazard on the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overt Racism by Louisiana Judge! by AJL</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/10/17/over-racism-by-louisiana-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>AJL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=645#comment-142</guid>
		<description>“There is a problem with both groups accepting a child from such a marriage,” Bardwell said. “I think those children suffer and I won’t help put them through it.”

Try and wrap your mind around his logic. If a black person will &quot;not accept&quot; a child that is not all black and a white person will &quot;not accept&quot; a child that is not all white, will a white person &quot;accept&quot; a child thas is all black or a black person &quot;accept&quot; a child that is all white? This white judge does not consider himself a racist because he has &quot;piles of black friends&quot; that are even allowed to use his bathroom. And I guess they will remain his friends as long as they keep their hands off of white people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“There is a problem with both groups accepting a child from such a marriage,” Bardwell said. “I think those children suffer and I won’t help put them through it.”</p>
<p>Try and wrap your mind around his logic. If a black person will &#8220;not accept&#8221; a child that is not all black and a white person will &#8220;not accept&#8221; a child that is not all white, will a white person &#8220;accept&#8221; a child thas is all black or a black person &#8220;accept&#8221; a child that is all white? This white judge does not consider himself a racist because he has &#8220;piles of black friends&#8221; that are even allowed to use his bathroom. And I guess they will remain his friends as long as they keep their hands off of white people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overt Racism by Louisiana Judge! by Nick White</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/10/17/over-racism-by-louisiana-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 05:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=645#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that the government can still tell people who they can or can&#039;t marry, wiretap their phones without warrants, and arrest and detain people without charges because THAT&#039;S what FREEDOM is all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that the government can still tell people who they can or can&#8217;t marry, wiretap their phones without warrants, and arrest and detain people without charges because THAT&#8217;S what FREEDOM is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overt Racism by Louisiana Judge! by Kelly Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/10/17/over-racism-by-louisiana-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=645#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Bonnie, you must be related to the judge or you definitely have the same mindset..illegal and ignorant. It is not his decision to make on who is to get married. His job is to uphold the laws and constitutions of this country, you know without prejudice. As since Lousiana cannot make a decision, then he federal needs to step in and charge him for violating Americans constitutional rights and every person of color that was every in his courtroom, cases needs to be examined.  You can pay his legal fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonnie, you must be related to the judge or you definitely have the same mindset..illegal and ignorant. It is not his decision to make on who is to get married. His job is to uphold the laws and constitutions of this country, you know without prejudice. As since Lousiana cannot make a decision, then he federal needs to step in and charge him for violating Americans constitutional rights and every person of color that was every in his courtroom, cases needs to be examined.  You can pay his legal fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overt Racism by Louisiana Judge! by Catherine Berryhill</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/10/17/over-racism-by-louisiana-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Berryhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=645#comment-136</guid>
		<description>As long as people put up with men in power abusing them and their power, we can only expect things to get worse in this country....Freedoms are not just for the powerful....God wants to rule man, but man will not be ruled by God. I suppose they had rather be ruled by other men....Not me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as people put up with men in power abusing them and their power, we can only expect things to get worse in this country&#8230;.Freedoms are not just for the powerful&#8230;.God wants to rule man, but man will not be ruled by God. I suppose they had rather be ruled by other men&#8230;.Not me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overt Racism by Louisiana Judge! by Mrphilly1</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/10/17/over-racism-by-louisiana-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrphilly1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=645#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Bonnie something is seriously wrong with you. You can&#039;t say 80% of blacks are racists no more than I can say 80% of Whites are.  Not only that blacks do not control TV, Radio, Fortune 500 business&#039;s.  Blacks are not in the position to stop Whites from getting jobs, housing...etc.  You are the racists for even thinking that this clown, who is a public servant, is right for picking and choosing when he wants to do his job. Let people marry who they want to marry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonnie something is seriously wrong with you. You can&#8217;t say 80% of blacks are racists no more than I can say 80% of Whites are.  Not only that blacks do not control TV, Radio, Fortune 500 business&#8217;s.  Blacks are not in the position to stop Whites from getting jobs, housing&#8230;etc.  You are the racists for even thinking that this clown, who is a public servant, is right for picking and choosing when he wants to do his job. Let people marry who they want to marry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overt Racism by Louisiana Judge! by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/10/17/over-racism-by-louisiana-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=645#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Bonnie, what drugs are you on? Public servants don&#039;t have a choice of who they serve or not serve. The man is a racist, PERIOD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonnie, what drugs are you on? Public servants don&#8217;t have a choice of who they serve or not serve. The man is a racist, PERIOD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overt Racism by Louisiana Judge! by lou</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/10/17/over-racism-by-louisiana-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=645#comment-131</guid>
		<description>So let me get this straight Bardwell is against inter-racial marriages because of how the kids are affected and inter-racial marriages don&#039;t last.  This has got to be the most backward ass redneck on the planet.  I assume he wants to protect children created in inter-racial marriages from people like himself.  If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck guess what.  It&#039;s a duck and Keith Bardwell you are a racist!  As for not marrying the couple because inter-racial marriages don&#039;t work then maybe white people shouldn&#039;t get married to white people either since half of those marriages don&#039;t work.  This guy thinks he&#039;s God or something!  What a doucher!  Very sad in this day and age!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me get this straight Bardwell is against inter-racial marriages because of how the kids are affected and inter-racial marriages don&#8217;t last.  This has got to be the most backward ass redneck on the planet.  I assume he wants to protect children created in inter-racial marriages from people like himself.  If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck guess what.  It&#8217;s a duck and Keith Bardwell you are a racist!  As for not marrying the couple because inter-racial marriages don&#8217;t work then maybe white people shouldn&#8217;t get married to white people either since half of those marriages don&#8217;t work.  This guy thinks he&#8217;s God or something!  What a doucher!  Very sad in this day and age!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overt Racism by Louisiana Judge! by Christian Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.rights.com/2009/10/17/over-racism-by-louisiana-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rights.com/?p=645#comment-130</guid>
		<description>* Mack, I would just say that two wrongs don&#039;t make a right.  If the government was not involved, it would not be an issue for them to decide, it would be the business of two parties, nothing more. And it is doing just want the Progressives of the late 1800s intended - giving a foothold for power and another issue to divide people on.
* Rob, interesting, thanks for sending the link.
* Sabby, the different between an obgyn and the Justice here is that the Justice has the imprint of the government here and the force of it behind him.  A private citizen does not.  I agree as a private citizen he can be as stupid as he wants, but not as someone who has sworn to uphold the law.  Anyone who does not uphold the law equally should not swear to do so.
* Bonnie, anyone - ANYONE - who makes a distinction based on race is a racist by definition.  Everyone is of course welcome to their opinion, but forcing it on others is the problem. In the past the government did not have any say in who you married because it wasn&#039;t their business.  Politicians wanted the power to do so and the result is that it has become a political issue instead of a liberty issue.
* Jim, I agree that there may be racists in the south, but there are often racists in the north who want to institutionalize racism - the government making different assessments based on the color of someone&#039;s skin.  It is called affirmative action.

Glad everyone had so much to say, as always, friendly discussion is welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* Mack, I would just say that two wrongs don&#8217;t make a right.  If the government was not involved, it would not be an issue for them to decide, it would be the business of two parties, nothing more. And it is doing just want the Progressives of the late 1800s intended &#8211; giving a foothold for power and another issue to divide people on.<br />
* Rob, interesting, thanks for sending the link.<br />
* Sabby, the different between an obgyn and the Justice here is that the Justice has the imprint of the government here and the force of it behind him.  A private citizen does not.  I agree as a private citizen he can be as stupid as he wants, but not as someone who has sworn to uphold the law.  Anyone who does not uphold the law equally should not swear to do so.<br />
* Bonnie, anyone &#8211; ANYONE &#8211; who makes a distinction based on race is a racist by definition.  Everyone is of course welcome to their opinion, but forcing it on others is the problem. In the past the government did not have any say in who you married because it wasn&#8217;t their business.  Politicians wanted the power to do so and the result is that it has become a political issue instead of a liberty issue.<br />
* Jim, I agree that there may be racists in the south, but there are often racists in the north who want to institutionalize racism &#8211; the government making different assessments based on the color of someone&#8217;s skin.  It is called affirmative action.</p>
<p>Glad everyone had so much to say, as always, friendly discussion is welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
